Case of Order of Justice of Allahabad High Court Shri Atul Sridharan in the case filed by Teachers Union Madris Arabia against National Human Rights Commission (NHRC)
New Delhi. Vishwa Hindu Parishad President and senior advocate Alok Kumar believes that those in high constitutional positions should exercise restraint in their comments on any subject. And the matter should be seen in the light of society as a whole. Darasal’s reaction comes after Allahabad High Court Justice Atul Sridharan’s remarks in the Madrasa case, in which he made institutional balance essential to maintain judicial Yes.
That’s the whole deal
The VHP president is surprised by the April 27 order issued by Allahabad High Court Justice Shri Atul Sridharan in the case filed by teachers union Madris Arabia against the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC). The order passed by the NHRC was challenged before the High Court directing the Director General of the Economic Offenses Wing (EOW) of the Uttar Pradesh government to investigate and report allegations including financial mismanagement in madrassas. instructions were given. Petitioner’s counsel requested an adjournment of the hearing because arguing counsel was unavailable. That’s the whole deal
The VHP president is surprised by the April 27 order issued by Allahabad High Court Justice Shri Atul Sridharan in the case filed by teachers union Madris Arabia against the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC). The order passed by the NHRC was challenged before the High Court directing the Director General of the Economic Offenses Wing (EOW) of the Uttar Pradesh government to investigate and report allegations including financial mismanagement in madrassas. instructions were given. Petitioner’s counsel requested an adjournment of the hearing because arguing counsel was unavailable. No one was present on behalf of the NHRC as it was a fresh case and no notice had been sent to the NHRC. The hearing was adjourned.
However, Justice Atul Sridharan in the absence of the counsels of the parties and without any argument preliminarily expressed the opinion that the order is beyond the jurisdiction of the NHRC. Whatever it is.
Why Attack on NHRC
VHP president advocate Alok Kumar said the judge attacked the NHRC. The judge alleged that the NHRC has never taken cognizance of cases in which members of the Muslim community have been attacked and in some cases they have been beaten and killed by justice… Not sure if NHRC has ever automatically taken note of such cases where Gunde take law in their hands and harass common citizens of the country…
The judge’s comments were so inappropriate that the other judge of the bench, Justice Vivek Saran, expressed dissent. He expressed his disagreement saying that he “disagrees with the order given by Bhai Justice Atul Sridharan”.The VHP president clearly states that he believes that lynching of any person, whatever their religion, is reprehensible, illegal and punishable. Those who commit crimes, regardless of religion, must face the consequences. The perpetrators do not belong to any religion and their acts are against civil society as a whole.
Special Requirements for Abstinence
So, in this case it is inappropriate to say that such incidents are happening against the followers of any particular religion. So, in this case it is inappropriate to say that such incidents are happening against the followers of any particular religion. These comments are factually wrong and could create discord among the major communities of India. There is a special need to exercise restraint from persons in high constitutional positions.
